We offer master and doctoral programs in
EE - Electrical Engineering
CE - Computer Engineering
CS - Computer Science
WHO SHOULD APPLY
A person may apply to the doctoral program with either a 4-year BS, BA, or a master's degree in a relevant field. Persons with 3-year technical degrees are generally not allowed to apply for graduate study at Northwestern University.
WHEN TO APPLY
MS applicants may apply to begin in the Fall, Winter, or Spring Quarter. However, Ph.D. applicants generally apply for the Fall Quarter. The only mechanism for Winter or Spring Quarter Ph.D. admission involves the intervention of one of our faculty, who must agree to support the student in question as a research assistant for the remainder of the academic year. To explore this possibility, contact individual professors listed in our department's faculty directory.
You can view a great deal of general information about requirements and policies at TGS - The Graduate School website [http://www.tgs.northwestern.edu]
APPLICATION DEADLINES for 2012/2013
Applications for the 2012/2013 academic year can be created starting September 3, 2012. Any applications submitted before September 3 (the date that ApplyYourself goes live) will be automatically rejected.
|The deadline for PhD applicants is December 31, 2012 (for Fall 2013)
Most of the decisions are typically finalized by the end of March, but some decisions may be made as late as April 15.
There are three deadlines for MS applicants:
The absolute deadlines regarding certain admissions-related actions by TGS are available here.
The required minimum scores for PhD students
- 90 IBT (Internet-based test), 233 CBT (computer-based test), and 577 PBT (paper-based test).
The required minimum scores for MS students
- 80 IBT, 213 CBT, and 550 PBT.
We understand that proceeding with the application process for graduate studies is not an easy decision or something that should be considered lightly. To help you in making up your mind and give you some hints regarding the overall evaluation criteria, we provide a discussion of some of the relevant issues below. Note that there are many context-specific factors that influence the decision about an individual application, which are impossible to summarize in a coherent manner. However, the "holistic review" and the influential items in it can be described as follows:
1. Academic record:
We do consider both the GPA and the institution. For example, the average GPA of the MS applicants admitted for the AY 2012-2013 was approx. 3.5/4.0. However, if someone has a GPA of, for example, 3.5/4.0 but is coming from a top-10 university in a country with 200+ universities, it will be considered differently from the same GPA from an institution that is ranked in the top 150, for example.
We do receive applications with transcripts using different GPA scales (10.0; 100%; etc...) and we apply the adjusted criteria to such scales. As another specific example, many of the universities from India have a "class-based" evaluation scheme, and we note that we will always give priority to "First Class with Distinction" applicants. The application process does allow you to write the "self-reported" GPA on the scale of 4.0, however, we will always use the transcripts during evaluation process.
Lastly, note that the evaluation is always "relative" -- i.e., in terms of the current pool of applicants.
2. Standardized test scores:
Typically, all the admitted applicants have GRE-Q scores higher than 760 (160 in the newer scale); GRE-V scores higher than 400 (146 in the newer scale). It is often the case that US applicants score higher than the international ones on the GRE-AW portion, however, we will weigh the TOEFL score as a demonstration of the linguistic capabilities indicator for international applicants.
More often than not (especially for PhD applicants) an EECS faculty interested in advising may conduct separate interviews, part of which will serve the purpose of attesting the English-speaking skills of a given applicant.
3. Statement of purpose:
This part of the overall application carries an extremely important weight and the ones that are written in a clear and focused manner will be favored. Namely, upon reading it, an evaluator/faculty should get a crisp idea as to:
- Why is it that you would like to work in a particular major/specialization/topic and with a particular faculty as your adviser (for MS applicants this could be a project or thesis adviser)?
- Why is it that a particular faculty should be interested in having you as an advisee?
In each case, a successful applicant will provide a good balance between background; vision; and desiderata.
Example: simply saying that you like Northwestern or you have a high esteem for the faculty in the EECS – aside from being flattering – is not a statement which, in itself, will "sell well".
Lastly – while this may not always be possible, it will be helpful if at least some (parts) of the recommendation letters can backup the claims made in the statement of purpose.
Note that, typically, an applicant is given the option to explicitly provide the names of the faculty that (s)he would like to work with as part of the application process itself.
4. Letters of Recommendation:
Make sure that, to whatever extent possible, the letters are stating something that distinguishes you (or, separates you) from the crowd. Example: if you think that a recommender will state something like 'he was in the top 25% in my class', try to find someone else to write you a letter of recommendation. As mentioned above, to whatever extent possible, these letters should reflect your capabilities listed in the statement of purpose. A minimum of two letters is recommended but three is highly recommended.
We will value all your achievements (e.g., awards received on competitions) and experiences (e.g., research projects; leadership) -- however, the best place to put them in a coherent manner is your resume. Ideally, some of these item should also be properly linked with the statement of purpose document.